On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >> Not a chance! Where is the commit message?
> >
> > Don't you think $subject is clear enough?
>
> I would add the comment at least on how the output is changed since
>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> Not a chance! Where is the commit message?
>
> Don't you think $subject is clear enough?
I would add the comment at least on how the output is changed since
pr_*("%s:"..., i2c->adap.name,...) to dev_*(&pdev->dev, ...)
replacement.
--
W
> Not a chance! Where is the commit message?
Don't you think $subject is clear enough?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Chris Packham
wrote:
On the first glance I have thought this is _the_ only patch that
doesn't make my eyes hurt.
Not a chance! Where is the commit message?
Code below though looks fine.
> @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ static int i2c_pca_pf_waitforcompletion(void *pd)
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:44:34PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
Applied to for-next, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c
index 7db481cbf402..395eca0cbb1f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-
6 matches
Mail list logo