On 2018-04-20 12:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
On 2018-04-20 12:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
On 2018-04-20 12:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> Yup, right you are!
>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on
On 2018-04-20 12:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> Yup, right you are!
>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:27:51PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
> said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
>
> This hooks the relevant work function previously called
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:27:51PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
> said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
>
> This hooks the relevant work function previously called
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> Yup, right you are!
>
> > [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> Yup, right you are!
>
> > [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1
On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
Yup, right you are!
> [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note
On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
Yup, right you are!
> [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note
Hi Peter,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Peter,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
> > This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> > componentized and instead expect to connect to a
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
> > This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> > componentized and instead expect to connect to a
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
> said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
>
> This hooks the
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
> componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
> said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
>
> This hooks the
This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
This hooks the relevant work function previously called by the encoder
and the component also to the bridge, since the encoder
This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not
componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That
said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc.
This hooks the relevant work function previously called by the encoder
and the component also to the bridge, since the encoder
18 matches
Mail list logo
