Move the guest enter/exit wrappers to kvm_host.h so that KVM can manage
its context tracking vs. vtime accounting without bleeding too many KVM
details into the context tracking code.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com>
---
 include/linux/context_tracking.h | 45 --------------------------------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking.h b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
index e172a547b2d0..d4dc9c4d79aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/context_tracking.h
+++ b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
@@ -118,49 +118,4 @@ extern void context_tracking_init(void);
 static inline void context_tracking_init(void) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE */
 
-/* must be called with irqs disabled */
-static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
-{
-       /*
-        * This is running in ioctl context so its safe to assume that it's the
-        * stime pending cputime to flush.
-        */
-       instrumentation_begin();
-       vtime_account_guest_enter();
-       instrumentation_end();
-
-       /*
-        * KVM does not hold any references to rcu protected data when it
-        * switches CPU into a guest mode. In fact switching to a guest mode
-        * is very similar to exiting to userspace from rcu point of view. In
-        * addition CPU may stay in a guest mode for quite a long time (up to
-        * one time slice). Lets treat guest mode as quiescent state, just like
-        * we do with user-mode execution.
-        */
-       if (!context_tracking_guest_enter_irqoff()) {
-               instrumentation_begin();
-               rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
-               instrumentation_end();
-       }
-}
-
-static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
-{
-       context_tracking_guest_exit_irqoff();
-
-       instrumentation_begin();
-       /* Flush the guest cputime we spent on the guest */
-       vtime_account_guest_exit();
-       instrumentation_end();
-}
-
-static inline void guest_exit(void)
-{
-       unsigned long flags;
-
-       local_irq_save(flags);
-       guest_exit_irqoff();
-       local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
-
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 3b06d12ec37e..444d5f0225cb 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -332,6 +332,51 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
        struct kvm_dirty_ring dirty_ring;
 };
 
+/* must be called with irqs disabled */
+static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
+{
+       /*
+        * This is running in ioctl context so its safe to assume that it's the
+        * stime pending cputime to flush.
+        */
+       instrumentation_begin();
+       vtime_account_guest_enter();
+       instrumentation_end();
+
+       /*
+        * KVM does not hold any references to rcu protected data when it
+        * switches CPU into a guest mode. In fact switching to a guest mode
+        * is very similar to exiting to userspace from rcu point of view. In
+        * addition CPU may stay in a guest mode for quite a long time (up to
+        * one time slice). Lets treat guest mode as quiescent state, just like
+        * we do with user-mode execution.
+        */
+       if (!context_tracking_guest_enter_irqoff()) {
+               instrumentation_begin();
+               rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
+               instrumentation_end();
+       }
+}
+
+static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
+{
+       context_tracking_guest_exit_irqoff();
+
+       instrumentation_begin();
+       /* Flush the guest cputime we spent on the guest */
+       vtime_account_guest_exit();
+       instrumentation_end();
+}
+
+static inline void guest_exit(void)
+{
+       unsigned long flags;
+
+       local_irq_save(flags);
+       guest_exit_irqoff();
+       local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
 static inline int kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        /*
-- 
2.31.1.368.gbe11c130af-goog

Reply via email to