On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
From: Brendan Gregg
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:46:26 -0800
> If I'm to use sock:inet_sock_set_state for TCP tracing, I'd like
> sk->sk_protocol exposed as a tracepoint argument so I can match on
> IPPROTO_TCP.
Agreed.
From: Brendan Gregg
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:46:26 -0800
> If I'm to use sock:inet_sock_set_state for TCP tracing, I'd like
> sk->sk_protocol exposed as a tracepoint argument so I can match on
> IPPROTO_TCP.
Agreed.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
>>> transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
>> transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
>> Currently
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Brendan Gregg
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
>> transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
>> Currently it traces all AF_INET state transition, so I
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
> transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
> Currently it traces all AF_INET state transition, so I rename this
> tracepoint to
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
> transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
> Currently it traces all AF_INET state transition, so I rename this
> tracepoint to inet_sock_set_state tracepoint with
As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
Currently it traces all AF_INET state transition, so I rename this
tracepoint to inet_sock_set_state tracepoint with some minor changes and move it
into trace/events/sock.h.
We
As sk_state is a common field for struct sock, so the state
transition tracepoint should not be a TCP specific feature.
Currently it traces all AF_INET state transition, so I rename this
tracepoint to inet_sock_set_state tracepoint with some minor changes and move it
into trace/events/sock.h.
We
12 matches
Mail list logo