On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> > > original thread.
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:04:19PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The duplicate versions of v38 are equal. The "backup" server was just
> really slow with vger. That's why I retried.
Well, vger has been really slow for a while now...
> As can be seen here both v38's are also complete:
>
> https
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:57:16PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > Hi Jarko,
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> > original thread.
>
> Probably because he bounced only the ones you didn't get, separately.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:57:16PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > Hi Jarko,
> > >
> > > It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
> > >
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> original thread.
Probably because he bounced only the ones you didn't get, separately.
> v38 has some missing patches as well.
And I got them twice. Can we ple
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> > original thread.
>
> Probably because he bounced only the ones you didn't get, separately.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> If you getting them (twice?) and vger's not, it sounds like vger is
> dropping them for some reason.
Yes, this has kinda been the case last and this week, for whatever
reason. From the two v38 submissions, I have only this in my LKM
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Hi Jarko,
> >
> > It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
> > Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing.
> >
> > Lore agrees with me:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:12AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Hi Jarko,
> >
> > It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
> > Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing.
> >
> > Lore agrees with me:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Hi Jarko,
>
> It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
> Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing.
>
> Lore agrees with me:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sak
Hi Jarko,
It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing.
Lore agrees with me:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com/
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 03:39:57PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen
From: Sean Christopherson
Add X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC, which informs whether or not the CPU supports SGX
Launch Control.
Add MSR_IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASH{0, 1, 2, 3}, which when combined contain a
SHA256 hash of a 3072-bit RSA public key. SGX backed software packages, so
called enclaves, are always signe
13 matches
Mail list logo
