On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:48:08AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> A couple of revisions ago I specifically asked Gustavo to create these
> 'silly' sizeof helpers to clean up...
>
> > > - (sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
> > > -
On 4/12/21 10:48, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Below are the results of running xfstests for "all" with the following
>>> configuration in local.config:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Other tests might need to be run in order to verify
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Below are the results of running xfstests for "all" with the following
> > configuration in local.config:
>
> ...
>
> > Other tests might need to be run in order to verify everything is working
> > as expected. For such
On 4/12/21 10:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Below are the results of running xfstests for "all" with the following
>> configuration in local.config:
>
> ...
>
>> Other tests might need to be run in order to verify everything is working
>> as expected. For such tests, the intervention of the
> Below are the results of running xfstests for "all" with the following
> configuration in local.config:
...
> Other tests might need to be run in order to verify everything is working
> as expected. For such tests, the intervention of the maintainers might be
> needed.
This is a little weird
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
6 matches
Mail list logo
