On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Peter H?we wrote:
> Care to change to
> > + "A TPM error (%zd) occurred attempting to determine the
> > timeouts\n",
>
> Sorry that I didn't spot it earlier.
Right.. Probably like this in my tree because of:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the updated patch!
Sorry, I have one really minor remark left:
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev,
> + "A TPM error (%d) occurred attempting to determine the
> timeouts\n",
rc is a ssize_t here and when compiling with C=1 I get
The TPM will respond to TPM_GET_CAP with TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT if
TPM_STARTUP has not been issued. Detect this and automatically
issue TPM_STARTUP.
This is for embedded applications where the kernel is the first thing
to touch the TPM.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
Tested-by: Peter Huewe
The TPM will respond to TPM_GET_CAP with TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT if
TPM_STARTUP has not been issued. Detect this and automatically
issue TPM_STARTUP.
This is for embedded applications where the kernel is the first thing
to touch the TPM.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the updated patch!
Sorry, I have one really minor remark left:
+ if (rc) {
+ dev_err(chip-dev,
+ A TPM error (%d) occurred attempting to determine the
timeouts\n,
rc is a ssize_t here and when compiling with C=1 I get
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Peter H?we wrote:
Care to change to
+ A TPM error (%zd) occurred attempting to determine the
timeouts\n,
Sorry that I didn't spot it earlier.
Right.. Probably like this in my tree because of:
6 matches
Mail list logo