On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:58:44AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 13-02-27 09:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
> >>
> >> if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
> >>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Your fix is compiling, running and yielding the correct results -
> > apologies about that.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier
>
> Ok, good. Committed and pushed out. Adding rmk and dhowells to the cc
> just to let them know, since Dave said they were debugging this on
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Mathieu Poirier
wrote:
>
> Your fix is compiling, running and yielding the correct results -
> apologies about that.
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier
Ok, good. Committed and pushed out. Adding rmk and dhowells to the cc
just to let them know, since Dave said they
On 13-02-27 09:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
>>
>> if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
>>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
>
> if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
> key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];
> 6d:
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];
6d: 66 8b 8c 00 00 00 00mov
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
>>> attached.
>>>
>>> .config attached.
>>>
>>> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
>> attached.
>>
>> .config attached.
>>
>> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
>>
>> if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
>> for
>
> this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
> attached.
>
> .config attached.
>
> It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
>
> if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
>
this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
attached.
.config attached.
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
attached.
.config attached.
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
this patch seems to be oopsing on my x86 32-bit machine on bootup, pic
attached.
.config attached.
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];
6d: 66 8b 8c 00 00 00 00mov0x0(%eax,%eax,1),%cx
74:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];
On 13-02-27 09:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
Your fix is compiling, running and yielding the correct results -
apologies about that.
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Ok, good. Committed and pushed out. Adding rmk and dhowells to the
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Your fix is compiling, running and yielding the correct results -
apologies about that.
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Ok, good. Committed and pushed out. Adding rmk and dhowells to the cc
just to let them know,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:58:44AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On 13-02-27 09:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks to me like the weak bit isn't working so well
if (platform_sysrq_reset_seq) {
Hi Mathieu,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 01:24:48PM -0700, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
>
> This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
> allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
> trigger device resets.
>
> The first time
Hi Mathieu,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 01:24:48PM -0700, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
The first time the key-combo is detected a work function that syncs
the filesystems is scheduled and the kernel
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
The first time the key-combo is detected a work function that syncs
the filesystems is scheduled
22 matches
Mail list logo
