On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:27:15AM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:19AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > What needs to happen (IMHO) is to make gpio_chips properly obeying
> > the device model, and then add the attributes for fiddling around with
> > GPIOs to either the
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:27:15AM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:19AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
What needs to happen (IMHO) is to make gpio_chips properly obeying
the device model, and then add the attributes for fiddling around with
GPIOs to either the *real*
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:19AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Sören Brinkmann
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Sören Brinkmann
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:19AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> >>> Implementing proper wakeup
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 09:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:49:17AM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > > Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
> > > marking/unmarking a GPIO
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Implementing proper wakeup support for unclaimed GPIOs would take some
>>> work (if at all desired), but that is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
Implementing proper wakeup support for unclaimed GPIOs would take some
work
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:49:17AM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>> > Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
>> > marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
> > marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
> > The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
> marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
> The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs directory, if an IRQ
> is associated with that GPIO and the irqchip
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 12:11PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs directory,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs directory, if an IRQ
is associated with that GPIO and the irqchip
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs directory, if an IRQ
is associated with that GPIO and the irqchip implements set_wake().
Writing 'enabled' to that file will enable wake for
Add an attribute 'wakeup' to the GPIO sysfs interface which allows
marking/unmarking a GPIO as wake IRQ.
The file 'wakeup' is created in each exported GPIOs directory, if an IRQ
is associated with that GPIO and the irqchip implements set_wake().
Writing 'enabled' to that file will enable wake for
20 matches
Mail list logo
