On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Günter,
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST re
Hi Günter,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
>> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2)
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> >
> > Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the har
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
>
> Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
> subsystem, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is sometimes used on integers
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:02:54PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Guenter,
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:38:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:02:19 -0700
> > Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > > DIV_RO
Hi Andrew, Guenter,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:38:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:02:19 -0700
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> >
> > Most of the time this does not matter. Howev
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:38:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:02:19 -0700
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> >
> > Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hard
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:02:19 -0700
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
>
> Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
> subsystem, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is sometimes used on integer
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
subsystem, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is sometimes used on integers which can be
negative (such as temperatures).
Signed-off-by: Gu
9 matches
Mail list logo