On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:02:18AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi - considering that the wake_q patches were picked up for tip/urgent, can
> this one make it in as well?
Ah, here it is. Yes, got it now.
I was actually wondering what happened, but couldn't find it in a hurry.
All sorted now.
Hi - considering that the wake_q patches were picked up for tip/urgent, can
this one make it in as well?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
On 12/18/2018 02:53 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Some users, specifically futexes and rwsems, required fixes
that allowed the caller
On 12/18/2018 02:53 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Some users, specifically futexes and rwsems, required fixes
> that allowed the callers to be safe when wakeups occur before
> they are expected by wake_up_q(). Such scenarios also play
> games and rely on reference counting, and until now were
> pivo
Some users, specifically futexes and rwsems, required fixes
that allowed the callers to be safe when wakeups occur before
they are expected by wake_up_q(). Such scenarios also play
games and rely on reference counting, and until now were
pivoting on wake_q doing it. With the wake_q_add() call bein
4 matches
Mail list logo