On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:53:48 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> index 5245d2f..bde2100 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> @@ -348,8 +348,17 @@ void
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:53:48 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> index 5245d2f..bde2100 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> >> @@ -348,8 +348,17 @@ void arch__sym_update(struct symbol *s,
On 04/10/2017 08:11 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:30:03 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently
On 04/10/2017 08:11 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:30:03 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently unable to deal with
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:30:03 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
> Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
> @[@]
> (Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
> is repeated.)
>
> perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:30:03 -0500
Paul Clarke wrote:
> Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
> @[@]
> (Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
> is repeated.)
>
> perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create
> user
On 04/06/2017 09:36 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:30:03PM -0500, Paul Clarke escreveu:
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently
On 04/06/2017 09:36 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:30:03PM -0500, Paul Clarke escreveu:
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently
Em Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:30:03PM -0500, Paul Clarke escreveu:
> Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
> @[@]
> (Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
> is repeated.)
>
> perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create
>
Em Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:30:03PM -0500, Paul Clarke escreveu:
> Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
> @[@]
> (Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
> is repeated.)
>
> perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create
>
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create
user probes at such symbols:
--
$ nm
Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as:
@[@]
(Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name
is repeated.)
perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create
user probes at such symbols:
--
$ nm
12 matches
Mail list logo