On 2016/6/30 10:53, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:40:23 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 2016/6/30 4:03, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/25
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:40:23 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 2016/6/30 4:03, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
> >> Yongji Xie wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 2016/6/25
Hi Alex,
On 2016/6/30 4:03, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Hi, Alex
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
> Yongji Xie wrote:
>
> > Hi, Alex
> >
> > On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
> > > Yongji Xie wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Alex
> > >>
> > >> O
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Hi, Alex
>
> On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
> > Yongji Xie wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Alex
> >>
> >> On 2016/6/24 11:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/24 11:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Hi, Alex
>
> On 2016/6/24 11:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
> > Yongji Xie wrote:
> >> On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
> >>> Yongji Xie wrote:
>
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/24 11:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
+static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
+{
+ struct resource
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 11:37 AM
>
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
> Yongji Xie wrote:
> > On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
> > > Yongji Xie wrote:
> > >> +static void vfio_pc
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:52:58 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
> > Yongji Xie wrote:
> >> +static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct resource *res;
> >> + int bar;
> >> + struct
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/24 0:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
performance issues
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
> page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
> performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
> this kin
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:39:30 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Hi, Alex
>
> On 2016/6/23 6:04, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
> > Yongji Xie wrote:
> >
> >> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
> >> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs
Hi, Alex
On 2016/6/23 6:04, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
performance issues
On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:06:37 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
> page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
> performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
> this kin
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
this kind of BARs. Guest will be not able to handle the mmio
accesses to
16 matches
Mail list logo