On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> > > iterations,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
iterations,
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:54:50 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Mathias Nyman (1):
> > > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
> > >
> > > Mika Westerberg (2):
> > > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
> > > i2c / ACPI: add
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:54:50 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Mathias Nyman (1):
gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
Mika Westerberg (2):
spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 08:13:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's
> "simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes" available from here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588
>
> There is a dependency to
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Mathias Nyman (1):
> > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
> >
> > Mika Westerberg (2):
> > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
> > i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
>
> This patchset has been around for quite a while
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
> >
> > I wonder if the GPIO
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> would like the patches to be modified somehow?
> If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
> the patches
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
>
> I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> would like the
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
would
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
would like the patches to be modified somehow?
If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
the patches depend on
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
I wonder if the
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Mathias Nyman (1):
gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
Mika Westerberg (2):
spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
This patchset has been around for quite a while and went
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 08:13:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's
simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes available from here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588
There is a dependency to linux-pm tree
This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's
"simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes" available from here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588
There is a dependency to linux-pm tree and to the above patches so I
propose to merge these via that same
This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's
simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes available from here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588
There is a dependency to linux-pm tree and to the above patches so I
propose to merge these via that same
16 matches
Mail list logo