Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-28 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > > > iterations,

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-28 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few iterations,

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:54:50 PM Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Mathias Nyman (1): > > > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support > > > > > > Mika Westerberg (2): > > > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support > > > i2c / ACPI: add

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:54:50 PM Jean Delvare wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Mathias Nyman (1): gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg (2): spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 08:13:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's > "simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes" available from here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588 > > There is a dependency to

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Jean Delvare
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Mathias Nyman (1): > > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support > > > > Mika Westerberg (2): > > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support > > i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support > > This patchset has been around for quite a while

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > > > I wonder if the GPIO

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > would like the patches to be modified somehow? > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because > the patches

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > would like the

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or would

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or would like the patches to be modified somehow? If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because the patches depend on

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. I wonder if the

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Jean Delvare
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Mathias Nyman (1): gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg (2): spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support This patchset has been around for quite a while and went

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 08:13:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes available from here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588 There is a dependency to linux-pm tree

[PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-20 Thread Mika Westerberg
This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's "simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes" available from here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588 There is a dependency to linux-pm tree and to the above patches so I propose to merge these via that same

[PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

2012-11-20 Thread Mika Westerberg
This is fourth version of the series. I've based these on top of Rafael's simplify glueing ACPI handles to physical nodes available from here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/19/588 There is a dependency to linux-pm tree and to the above patches so I propose to merge these via that same