Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-26 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Can you place these patches onto their own branch, tag it and send the appropriate pull-request out

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-26 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Can you place these patches onto their own branch, tag it and send the appropriate pull-request out

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to > > your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Right. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI enumerated devices behind I2C bus. This patch series dedicated to enable those devices. The MFD framework is also updated to cope with interesting implementation of the cell descriptions under ACPI MFD (patch 1). The patches 5

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to > > your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Right. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel

[PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

2015-10-23 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI enumerated devices behind I2C bus. This patch series dedicated to enable those devices. The MFD framework is also updated to cope with interesting implementation of the cell descriptions under ACPI MFD (patch 1). The patches 5