On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 5:29 PM Charles Keepax
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:31 PM Charles Keepax
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
> > > probe path as possible. Note th
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:31 PM Charles Keepax
> wrote:
> >
> > This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
> > probe path as possible. Note that I don't have a great setup
> > for testing these patches so they a
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:31 PM Charles Keepax
wrote:
>
> This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
> probe path as possible. Note that I don't have a great setup
> for testing these patches so they are mostly just build tested
> and need careful review and testing before any of
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:30:54PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
> probe path as possible. Note that I don't have a great setup
> for testing these patches so they are mostly just build tested
> and need careful review and testing before
This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
probe path as possible. Note that I don't have a great setup
for testing these patches so they are mostly just build tested
and need careful review and testing before any of them are
merged.
The series brings the ACPI path inline with the
5 matches
Mail list logo
