On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:02:30PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 31-01-19 11:10:06, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >
> > Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
> > and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
> > optimization is effectively disabled bec
On Thu 31-01-19 11:10:06, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
> and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
> optimization is effectively disabled because of invalidate_range
> calls. With a minimal couple lines patch
Am 31.01.19 um 17:10 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
optimization is effectively disabled because of invalidate_range
calls. With a minimal couple lines patch on top of th
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:55:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:10:06 -0500 Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> > Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
> > and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
> > optimization is effectively
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:10:06 -0500 Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
> and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
> optimization is effectively disabled because of invalidate_range
> calls. With a minimal couple line
Andrew what is your plan for this ? I had a discussion with Peter Xu
and Andrea about change_pte() and kvm. Today the change_pte() kvm
optimization is effectively disabled because of invalidate_range
calls. With a minimal couple lines patch on top of this patchset
we can bring back the kvm change
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:54:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:23 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Jérôme Glisse
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew, i see that you still have my event patch in you queue [1].
> > > This patchset
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:54:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:23 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Jérôme Glisse
> >
> > Hi Andrew, i see that you still have my event patch in you queue [1].
> > This patchset replace that single patch and is broken down in further
> > step so th
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:23 PM wrote:
>
> From: Jérôme Glisse
>
> Hi Andrew, i see that you still have my event patch in you queue [1].
> This patchset replace that single patch and is broken down in further
> step so that it is easier to review and ascertain that no mistake were
> made during m
From: Jérôme Glisse
Hi Andrew, i see that you still have my event patch in you queue [1].
This patchset replace that single patch and is broken down in further
step so that it is easier to review and ascertain that no mistake were
made during mechanical changes. Here are the step:
Patch 1 -
10 matches
Mail list logo