Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > >> Hi Nicolas, > > >> > > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >>> This

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > >> Hi Nicolas, > > >> > > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >>> This

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:28:13 +1000 Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:28:13 +1000 Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Greg Ungerer
On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable >>> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-22 Thread Greg Ungerer
On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable >>> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. >>>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. > > Also thrown in are various cleanups to

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. > > Also thrown in are various cleanups to

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-21 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Nicolas, On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. > Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c. I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-21 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Nicolas, On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. > Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c. I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run

[PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-20 Thread Nicolas Pitre
This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c. This can also be found in the following git repo:

[PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

2016-07-20 Thread Nicolas Pitre
This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c. This can also be found in the following git repo: