On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > >> Hi Nicolas,
> > >>
> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >>> This
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > >> Hi Nicolas,
> > >>
> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >>> This
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> >>>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:13PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> >>>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:28:13 +1000
Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:28:13 +1000
Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> >>>
On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
>>> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
>>>
On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
>>> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
>>>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
> > Also thrown in are various cleanups to
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
> > Also thrown in are various cleanups to
Hi Nicolas,
On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
> Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c.
I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run
Hi Nicolas,
On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
> Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c.
I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run
This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c.
This can also be found in the following git repo:
This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c.
This can also be found in the following git repo:
14 matches
Mail list logo