* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:33:32PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > This is the first big batch of x86 asm-to-C conversion patches.
>
> So yeah, I think I'm done. It looks good to me, except the minor things
> already
> raised. I've tested the tree already on my bo
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:33:32PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is the first big batch of x86 asm-to-C conversion patches.
So yeah, I think I'm done. It looks good to me, except the minor things
already raised. I've tested the tree already on my boxes here and it was
ok.
Maybe it is time
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> Andy,
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This is the first big batch of x86 asm-to-C conversion patches.
>>
>
> Do you have a git tree for that?
I just tagged it here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/ker
Andy,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is the first big batch of x86 asm-to-C conversion patches.
>
> The exit-to-usermode code is copied in several places and is written
> in a nasty combination of asm and C. It's not at all clear what
> it's supposed to do, and th
This is the first big batch of x86 asm-to-C conversion patches.
The exit-to-usermode code is copied in several places and is written
in a nasty combination of asm and C. It's not at all clear what
it's supposed to do, and the way it's structured makes it very hard
to work with. For example, it's
5 matches
Mail list logo