Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-06 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:58:29PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Maybe I missed this from a previous version, but can you explain the > motivation for replacing the radix tree with an xarray? (I think this should > probably still be part of the cover letter?) Do we have a performance problem > we

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-06 Thread Ross Zwisler
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of the XArray. > Last posted two weeks ago, this version includes a *lot* of changes. > I'd like to thank Dave Chinner for his feedback, encouragem

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 06:05:15PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:45:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > > > I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:17:52PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:53:41AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Huh, you've caught a couple of problems that 0day hasn't sent me yet. Try > > turning on DAX or TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE. Thanks! > > Dax is turned on, CONFIG_TRANSPAR

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Chinner
s Axboe ; Rehas > > Sachdeva ; linux...@kvack.org; linux- > > fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux- > > ni...@vger.kernel.org; linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:45:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of the XArray. > > Last posted two weeks ago, this version includes a *lot* o

RE: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
nux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4 > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:45:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > > > I looked

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:45:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of the XArray. > > Last posted two weeks ago, this version includes a *lot* o

Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:40:46PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > > I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of the XArray. > Last posted two weeks ago, this version includes a *lot* of changes. > I'd like to thank Dave Chinner for his feedback, encouragem

[PATCH v4 00/73] XArray version 4

2017-12-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
From: Matthew Wilcox I looked through some notes and decided this was version 4 of the XArray. Last posted two weeks ago, this version includes a *lot* of changes. I'd like to thank Dave Chinner for his feedback, encouragement and distracting ideas for improvement, which I'll get to once this is