On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:25:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 17:06 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
> > protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
> > values to avoid misuses and
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:25:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 17:06 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
> > protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
> > values to avoid misuses and
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 17:06 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
> protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
> values to avoid misuses and help with semantics later at boot
> time should this be used further.
>
>
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 17:06 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
> protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
> values to avoid misuses and help with semantics later at boot
> time should this be used further.
>
>
Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
values to avoid misuses and help with semantics later at boot
time should this be used further.
These enums should only ever be used by architecture x86 code,
and all
Although hardware_subarch has been in place since the x86 boot
protocol 2.07 it hasn't been used much. Enumerate current possible
values to avoid misuses and help with semantics later at boot
time should this be used further.
These enums should only ever be used by architecture x86 code,
and all
6 matches
Mail list logo
