Re: [PATCH v4 02/36] hrtimer: Correct blantanly wrong comment

2018-01-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner > > The protection of a hrtimer which runs its callback against migration to a > different CPU has nothing to do with hard interrupt context. > > The protection against migration of a hrtimer running the expiry callback > is the pointer in

Re: [PATCH v4 02/36] hrtimer: Correct blantanly wrong comment

2018-01-11 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner > > The protection of a hrtimer which runs its callback against migration to a > different CPU has nothing to do with hard interrupt context. > > The protection against migration of a hrtimer running the

[PATCH v4 02/36] hrtimer: Correct blantanly wrong comment

2017-12-21 Thread Anna-Maria Gleixner
From: Thomas Gleixner The protection of a hrtimer which runs its callback against migration to a different CPU has nothing to do with hard interrupt context. The protection against migration of a hrtimer running the expiry callback is the pointer in the cpu_base which holds a pointer to the curr