Re: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API

2014-11-03 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 03/11/2014 13:33, Maxime Ripard : > Hi Nicolas, > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 28/10/2014 22:25, Maxime Ripard : >>> We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have >>> been >>> exposed in the first place. Change the callers

Re: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API

2014-11-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 28/10/2014 22:25, Maxime Ripard : > > We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have > > been > > exposed in the first place. Change the callers to use the proper API. > > > > Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API

2014-11-03 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 28/10/2014 22:25, Maxime Ripard : > We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have > been > exposed in the first place. Change the callers to use the proper API. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre Thanks, Maxime. Do I have to carry the patc

[PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API

2014-10-28 Thread Maxime Ripard
We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have been exposed in the first place. Change the callers to use the proper API. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/