On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:31:37AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Right, so what you're proposing is to come up with a DT description for
> the existing stuff, and then have to change (or at the very least augment)
> that description later when the DPCM stuff goes in.
> What should be d
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:42:09AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:38:47PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > If someone wants to it should also be possible to convert the existing
> > > platforms wit
Dear Jean-Francois Moine,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:06:23 +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > we need at least two more compatibles for the audio controller found on
> > Dove and Kirkwood respectively. This is how we are going to distinguish
> > those two, e.g. Kirkwood has SPDIF in which Dove hasn
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:38:47PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If someone wants to it should also be possible to convert the existing
> > platforms without S/PDIF support over to DT, providing you don't mind
> > changing
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> If someone wants to it should also be possible to convert the existing
> platforms without S/PDIF support over to DT, providing you don't mind
> changing the code once the DPCM and S/PDIF support is added and a bit of
> thought is put in
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:25:16PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Sigh, you completely miss the point.
> What all three of us are ultimately after is a DT description for the
> kirkwood stuff which covers all its use cases. The use case which all
> three of us have in common is the Cub
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 02:09:32PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > So extend Morimoto-san's work on the simple card for this - that's what
> > > it's there f
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 02:09:32PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > So extend Morimoto-san's work on the simple card for this - that's what
> > it's there for, it's doing exactly this job for non-DT systems but it
> > just did
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:39:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> So extend Morimoto-san's work on the simple card for this - that's what
> it's there for, it's doing exactly this job for non-DT systems but it
> just didn't get DT support added yet. All the trivial cards should end
> up using this.
I
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> And that is *the only thing* that keeps bugging me in Mark's replies -
> he *insists* on having that virtual audio nodes. I have nothing against
> it, except it should be *required* for every DT we have. DRM doesn't
> _need_
On 08/09/13 11:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:34:30AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I do understand there may be SoCs requiring sophisticated extra audio
nodes, but Marvell SoCs don't. I prefer having a single node for the
i2s controller *and* exploit the au
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:43:40 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Note that we do have another case not yet in tree, which is DRM, but
> this case is different from that, because ASoC can cope with components
> with independent initialisation.
No sure!
Sometimes, with the tda998x in HDMI mode
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 11:34 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > I do understand there may be SoCs requiring sophisticated extra audio
> > nodes, but Marvell SoCs don't. I prefer having a single node for the
> > i2s controller *and* exp
On 08/09/2013 11:34 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/09/13 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2013 01:22 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
>>
+i2s1: audio-controller@b4000 {
+compatible = "mrvl,mvebu-aud
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:34:30AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I do understand there may be SoCs requiring sophisticated extra audio
> nodes, but Marvell SoCs don't. I prefer having a single node for the
> i2s controller *and* exploit the audio subsystem properties from that.
>
On 08/09/13 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 08/08/2013 01:22 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
+i2s1: audio-controller@b4000 {
+ compatible = "mrvl,mvebu-audio";
+ reg = <0xb4000 0x2210>;
+ interrupts = <21>, <2
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:23:50 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > we need at least two more compatibles for the audio controller found on
> > Dove and Kirkwood respectively. This is how we are going to distinguish
> > those
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 01:22 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >+i2s1: audio-controller@b4000 {
> >+compatible = "mrvl,mvebu-audio";
> >+reg = <0xb4000 0x2210>;
> >+interrupts = <21>, <22>;
> >+clocks = <&gate_clk 13>;
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:23:50 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 01:22 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > This patch adds DT support to the audio subsystem of the mvebu family
> > (Kirkwood, Dove, Armada 370).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
> > ---
> > .../devicetree
On 08/08/2013 01:22 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
This patch adds DT support to the audio subsystem of the mvebu family
(Kirkwood, Dove, Armada 370).
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
---
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/mvebu-audio.txt | 29 ++
sound/soc/kirkwood/kir
This patch adds DT support to the audio subsystem of the mvebu family
(Kirkwood, Dove, Armada 370).
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
---
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/mvebu-audio.txt | 29 ++
sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c | 26 +
21 matches
Mail list logo
