Dave Chiluk writes:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:33:07AM -0700, bseg...@google.com wrote:
>> This still has a similar cost as reducing min_cfs_rq_runtime to 0 - we
>> now take a tg-global lock on every group se dequeue. Setting min=0 means
>> that we have to take it on both enqueue and dequeue, w
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:33:07AM -0700, bseg...@google.com wrote:
> This still has a similar cost as reducing min_cfs_rq_runtime to 0 - we
> now take a tg-global lock on every group se dequeue. Setting min=0 means
> that we have to take it on both enqueue and dequeue, while baseline
> means we ta
Dave Chiluk writes:
> It has been observed, that highly-threaded, user-interactive
> applications running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints can hit a high
> percentage of periods throttled while simultaneously not consuming the
> allocated amount of quota. This impacts user-interactive non-cpu b
It has been observed, that highly-threaded, user-interactive
applications running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints can hit a high
percentage of periods throttled while simultaneously not consuming the
allocated amount of quota. This impacts user-interactive non-cpu bound
applications, such as tho
4 matches
Mail list logo