On Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 05:19:27 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Ping. Any updates? I think this was pretty close to inclusion?
>
> Hi, Wolfram
> Thanks for your concern. Sorry for my reply so late. I had on a business
> trip for
On Fri, May 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> Ping. Any updates? I think this was pretty close to inclusion?
Hi, Wolfram
Thanks for your concern. Sorry for my reply so late. I had on a
business trip for months.
At that time I have no device to debug it. Now, I'm come
On Fri, May 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Ping. Any updates? I think this was pretty close to inclusion?
Hi, Wolfram
Thanks for your concern. Sorry for my reply so late. I had on a
business trip for months.
At that time I have no device to debug it. Now, I'm come back
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 05:19:27 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Ping. Any updates? I think this was pretty close to inclusion?
Hi, Wolfram
Thanks for your concern. Sorry for my reply so late. I had on a business
trip for months.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The ugly is my work or even the ability but not the attitude, I think.
>
> Explaining which tests were done is what I wanted to request more often
> from submitters anyhow. Your leftover (yes, this can happen) just
> reminded me to
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
The ugly is my work or even the ability but not the attitude, I think.
Explaining which tests were done is what I wanted to request more often
from submitters anyhow. Your leftover (yes, this can happen) just
reminded me to
> The ugly is my work or even the ability but not the attitude, I think.
Explaining which tests were done is what I wanted to request more often
from submitters anyhow. Your leftover (yes, this can happen) just
reminded me to actually do that :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 22:29:32 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> > Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
> > You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
> > node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> > Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
> > You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
> > node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
> You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
> node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
[...]
Since you will be fixing that superfluous return 0; (I
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 11:49:39 AM, sourav wrote:
[...]
> > +/* Functions for DMA support */
> > +static int i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> > + dma_addr_t phy_addr)
> > +{
> > + struct imx_i2c_dma *dma;
> > + struct
+
+dma->chan_tx = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "tx");
+return 0;
To be more clear,
return here looks to be some leftover.
?? Looks to be some leftover?
+if (!dma->chan_tx) {
+dev_info(dev, "DMA tx channel request failed\n");
+ret = -ENODEV;
+goto
Hi,
On Friday 04 April 2014 08:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 372
Hi,
On Friday 04 April 2014 08:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yaoyao.y...@freescale.com
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 372
+
+dma-chan_tx = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, tx);
+return 0;
To be more clear,
return here looks to be some leftover.
?? Looks to be some leftover?
+if (!dma-chan_tx) {
+dev_info(dev, DMA tx channel request failed\n);
+ret = -ENODEV;
+goto fail_al;
+
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 11:49:39 AM, sourav wrote:
[...]
+/* Functions for DMA support */
+static int i2c_imx_dma_request(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
+ dma_addr_t phy_addr)
+{
+ struct imx_i2c_dma *dma;
+ struct dma_slave_config
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao yao.y...@freescale.com
[...]
Since you will be fixing that
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 22:29:32 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, April 04, 2014 at 04:41:11 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts
node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
The ugly is my work or even the ability but not the attitude, I think.
Explaining which tests were done is what I wanted to request more often
from submitters anyhow. Your leftover (yes, this can happen) just
reminded me to actually do that :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 372 +--
1 file changed, 319 insertions(+), 53
Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts node.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao yao.y...@freescale.com
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 372 +--
1 file changed, 319
22 matches
Mail list logo
