Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-22 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Sergei Ianovich writes: > On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 00:12 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Sergei Ianovich writes: >> >> > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 20:31 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> > I understand that people are afraid of taking this patch. If it >> > starts >> > causing troubles at runtime, it wi

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-20 Thread Sergei Ianovich
On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 00:12 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Sergei Ianovich writes: > > > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 20:31 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > > Sergei Ianovich writes: > > > Thanks for spotting this. This is caused by a change in the latest > > > > version of the patch (SERIAL_8250_PXA i

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Sergei Ianovich writes: > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 20:31 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Sergei Ianovich writes: >> Thanks for spotting this. This is caused by a change in the latest >> > version of the patch (SERIAL_8250_PXA instead of SERIAL_PXA). This >> > change could be reverted. >> Actually I

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Sergei Ianovich
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 20:31 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Sergei Ianovich writes: > Thanks for spotting this. This is caused by a change in the latest > > version of the patch (SERIAL_8250_PXA instead of SERIAL_PXA). This > > change could be reverted. > Actually I'm against the revert. > The name

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Sergei Ianovich writes: > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:26 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Robert Jarzmik writes: >> >> > Sergei Ianovich writes: >> > >> > > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> > > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, >> >

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Sergei Ianovich
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 14:26 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > Sergei Ianovich writes: > > > > > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > > > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > > > it was impossible to use 8250 dr

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik writes: > Sergei Ianovich writes: > >> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, >> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. >> >> Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to b

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-19 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Sergei Ianovich writes: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of > 8250_core driver.

[PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

2015-12-09 Thread Sergei Ianovich
pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of 8250_core driver. Workaround for Erratum #19 according