Hello, Chris.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:12:43PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I could certainly make schedule_on_cpu_mask() do sanity checking,
> perhaps via a WARN_ON_ONCE() if offline cpus were specified, and
> otherwise just have it create a local struct cpumask that it and's
> with cpu_online
On 8/9/2013 11:02 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Chris.
>
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:49:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> This primitive allows scheduling work to run on a particular set of
>> cpus described by a "struct cpumask". This can be useful, for example,
>> if you have a per-cpu variab
Hello, Chris.
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:49:44PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> This primitive allows scheduling work to run on a particular set of
> cpus described by a "struct cpumask". This can be useful, for example,
> if you have a per-cpu variable that requires code execution only if the
> p
This primitive allows scheduling work to run on a particular set of
cpus described by a "struct cpumask". This can be useful, for example,
if you have a per-cpu variable that requires code execution only if the
per-cpu variable has a certain value (for example, is a non-empty list).
Signed-off-by
4 matches
Mail list logo
