On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:41:05AM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> They don't apply cleanly to v4.14 anymore because of the recent header change.
>
> I figured they would need to be fixed up and submitted separately to older
> stable
> versions. Is that okay?
Ah yes, right.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gru
...@milecki.pl;
> cle...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/MCE: Add function to allow filtering of MCA
> errors
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:34:22PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> > From: Yazen Ghannam
> >
> > Some systems may report spurious MCA errors.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:34:22PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> Some systems may report spurious MCA errors. In general, spurious MCA
> errors may be disabled by clearing a particular bit in MCA_CTL. However,
> clearing a bit in MCA_CTL may not be recommended for some er
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:34:22PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> Some systems may report spurious MCA errors. In general, spurious MCA
> errors may be disabled by clearing a particular bit in MCA_CTL. However,
> clearing a bit in MCA_CTL may not be recommended for some er
From: Yazen Ghannam
Some systems may report spurious MCA errors. In general, spurious MCA
errors may be disabled by clearing a particular bit in MCA_CTL. However,
clearing a bit in MCA_CTL may not be recommended for some errors, so the
only option is to ignore them.
An MCA error is printed and h
5 matches
Mail list logo