On 03/26/2017 10:44 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
Regression reported: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194969
Thanks, I commented the bug.
--
Jarkko
On 03/26/2017 10:44 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
Regression reported: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194969
Thanks, I commented the bug.
--
Jarkko
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:18:53PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: José Roberto de Souza
>
> If we aren't going to continue using the controller we can just disable
> it instead of waiting for it to complete. The biggest improvement here
> is when a I2C transaction is
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:18:53PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: José Roberto de Souza
>
> If we aren't going to continue using the controller we can just disable
> it instead of waiting for it to complete. The biggest improvement here
> is when a I2C transaction is completed and it
From: José Roberto de Souza
If we aren't going to continue using the controller we can just disable
it instead of waiting for it to complete. The biggest improvement here
is when a I2C transaction is completed and it doesn't block until
the adapter is disabled. When a new
From: José Roberto de Souza
If we aren't going to continue using the controller we can just disable
it instead of waiting for it to complete. The biggest improvement here
is when a I2C transaction is completed and it doesn't block until
the adapter is disabled. When a new transfer is needed we
6 matches
Mail list logo