Hi Thierry,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:28 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps Clemens and Sven can shed some light into how this driver is
> being used. There clearly seem to be people interested in this driver,
> so why are there no consumers of this upstream. What's keeping people
> from upst
Hi Thierry,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:28 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps Clemens and Sven can shed some light into how this driver is
> being used. There clearly seem to be people interested in this driver,
> so why are there no consumers of this upstream. What's keeping people
> from upst
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:28:24PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:34:54AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Thierry,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:34:54AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > >
Hello Thierry,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Like I said, that's not what I was saying. I was merely saying that if
> > >
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Like I said, that's not what I was saying. I was merely saying that if
> > there aren't any use-cases that current users rely on that would be
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Clemens Gruber
wrote:
>
> After reading your reasoning in this mail and rethinking the whole
> situation, I do no longer have any objections to the more complex
> solution. (Allowing 0% and 100% duty cycle channels with any period)
>
> I first thought it would be to
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:01:24AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Thierry,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >
Hello Thierry,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Like I said, that's not what I was saying. I was merely saying that if
> there aren't any use-cases that current users rely on that would be
> broken by using this simpler implementation, then I'm okay with it, even
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:01:24AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hello Thierry, hello Sven,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:57:1
Hello Thierry,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Thierry, hello Sven,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:57:12PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:44:42AM -0500,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry, hello Sven,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:57:12PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > > wro
Hi everyone,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry, hello Sven,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:57:12PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Uwe Kleine-Kö
Hello Sven,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 AM Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> >
> > Is this really that complicated? I sounds to me like the only thing that
> > you need is to have some sort of usage count for the prescaler. Whenever
>
Hello Thierry, hello Sven,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:57:12PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > If this is already in the old code, this probably warrants a s
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> Is this really that complicated? I sounds to me like the only thing that
> you need is to have some sort of usage count for the prescaler. Whenever
> you want to use the prescaler you check that usage count. If it is zero,
> then you can ju
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Uwe, Thierry,
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > If this is already in the old code, this probably warrants a separate
> > fix, and yes, I consider this a severe bug. (Consider one channel
> > d
Uwe, Thierry,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:10 AM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> If this is already in the old code, this probably warrants a separate
> fix, and yes, I consider this a severe bug. (Consider one channel
> driving a motor and reconfiguring an LED modifies the motor's speed.)
>
I think you
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:12:18AM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> Hello Uwe,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:10:33AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Clemens,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-
Hello Uwe,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:10:33AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Clemens,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:36:27PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wr
Hello Sven,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:00 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > This is not acceptable, if you have two PWM outputs and a consumer
> > modifies one of them the other must change. So if this chip only
> > supports a
Hello Clemens,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:36:27PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > The hardware readout may return slightly different values than those
> > > th
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:22:08PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Hi Clemens, see below.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:37 PM Clemens Gruber
> wrote:
> >
> > The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> > previously experienced issues:
> > - The duty cycle is no
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:00 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > This is not acceptable, if you have two PWM outputs and a consumer
> > modifies one of them the other must change. So if this chip only
> > supports a
Hi Clemens, see below.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:37 PM Clemens Gruber
wrote:
>
> The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> previously experienced issues:
> - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
> OFF registers were cleared in disable a
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:36:27PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> > previously experienced issues:
> > - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (
Hi Uwe,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:00 PM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> This is not acceptable, if you have two PWM outputs and a consumer
> modifies one of them the other must change. So if this chip only
> supports a single period length of all channels, the first consumer
> enabling a channel defin
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:36:27PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> previously experienced issues:
> - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
> OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was
The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
previously experienced issues:
- The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was required to
call config to restore the duty cycle settings)
- If one s
29 matches
Mail list logo
