В Пт, 24/10/2014 в 17:32 +0800, Wanpeng Li пишет:
> Hi Kirill,
> 10/24/14, 2:01 PM, Kirill Tkhai:
> > Hi, Wanpeng,
> >
> > the commit commentary confuses, I'm agree. Really it's just a cleanup.
> >
> > On Пт, 2014-10-24 at 07:27 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> Hi Kirill,
> >> 8/6/14, 4:06 PM, Kirill
Hi Kirill,
10/24/14, 2:01 PM, Kirill Tkhai:
Hi, Wanpeng,
the commit commentary confuses, I'm agree. Really it's just a cleanup.
On Пт, 2014-10-24 at 07:27 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
Hi Kirill,
8/6/14, 4:06 PM, Kirill Tkhai:
(sched_entity::on_rq == 1) does not guarantee the task is pickable;
cha
Hi, Wanpeng,
the commit commentary confuses, I'm agree. Really it's just a cleanup.
On Пт, 2014-10-24 at 07:27 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
> 8/6/14, 4:06 PM, Kirill Tkhai:
> > (sched_entity::on_rq == 1) does not guarantee the task is pickable;
> > changes on throttled cfs_rq must not le
Hi Kirill,
8/6/14, 4:06 PM, Kirill Tkhai:
(sched_entity::on_rq == 1) does not guarantee the task is pickable;
changes on throttled cfs_rq must not lead to reschedule.
Why (sched_entity::on_rq == 1) doesn't guarantee the task is pickable
since entity will be dequeued during throttling cfs_rq?
(sched_entity::on_rq == 1) does not guarantee the task is pickable;
changes on throttled cfs_rq must not lead to reschedule.
Check for task_struct::on_rq instead.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai
---
kernel/sched/fair.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ke
5 matches
Mail list logo
