Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:35 AM, Mitchel Humpherys wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote: > > This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* > > instead of printk. > > > > WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level > > > > Cc: Catalin

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote: > This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* > instead of printk. > > WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee > Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung > --- >

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:35 AM, Mitchel Humpherys wrote: On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc:

[PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung --- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7

[PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung sungjinn.ch...@samsung.com ---