Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 02:36:48PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Wu Hao wrote: > > Hi Hao, > > Please see my two comments inline. > > Thanks, > Matthew Gerlach > > >On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com > >wrote:

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 02:36:48PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Wu Hao wrote: > > Hi Hao, > > Please see my two comments inline. > > Thanks, > Matthew Gerlach > > >On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com > >wrote:

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Wu Hao wrote: Hi Hao, Please see my two comments inline. Thanks, Matthew Gerlach On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: Hi Hao, I do think we should consider different hw

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Wu Hao wrote: Hi Hao, Please see my two comments inline. Thanks, Matthew Gerlach On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: Hi Hao, I do think we should consider different hw

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com > wrote: >> >> Hi Hao, >> >> I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code >> because it does look like most of it is

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com > wrote: >> >> Hi Hao, >> >> I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code >> because it does look like most of it is generic. Specifically, I

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: > > > Hi Hao, > > I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code > because it does look like most of it is generic. Specifically, I think >

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:31PM -0700, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: > > > Hi Hao, > > I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code > because it does look like most of it is generic. Specifically, I think >

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: Hi Hao, I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code because it does look like most of it is generic. Specifically, I think we should consider DFH based fpga images that have been shipped already, and I think we need to

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alan Tull wrote: Hi Hao, I do think we should consider different hw implementations with this code because it does look like most of it is generic. Specifically, I think we should consider DFH based fpga images that have been shipped already, and I think we need to

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:29:35PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: > >> > >> Hi Hao, > > > > Hi Alan, >

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:29:35PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: > >> > >> Hi Hao, > > > > Hi Alan, > > > > Thanks for the comments. > >

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: >> >> Hi Hao, > > Hi Alan, > > Thanks for the comments. > >> >> We are going to want to be able use

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: >> >> Hi Hao, > > Hi Alan, > > Thanks for the comments. > >> >> We are going to want to be able use different FPGA managers with this >>

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: > > Hi Hao, Hi Alan, Thanks for the comments. > > We are going to want to be able use different FPGA managers with this > framework. The different manager may be

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:46:02PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: > > Hi Hao, Hi Alan, Thanks for the comments. > > We are going to want to be able use different FPGA managers with this > framework. The different manager may be part of a different

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: Hi Hao, We are going to want to be able use different FPGA managers with this framework. The different manager may be part of a different FME in fabric or it may be a hardware FPGA manager. Fortunately, at this point now the

Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote: Hi Hao, We are going to want to be able use different FPGA managers with this framework. The different manager may be part of a different FME in fabric or it may be a hardware FPGA manager. Fortunately, at this point now the changes, noted below,

[PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

From: Kang Luwei Partial Reconfiguration (PR) is the most important function for FME. It allows reconfiguration for given Port/Accelerated Function Unit (AFU). It creates platform devices for fpga-mgr, fpga-regions and fpga-bridges, and invokes fpga-region's interface

[PATCH v4 14/24] fpga: dfl: fme: add partial reconfiguration sub feature support

From: Kang Luwei Partial Reconfiguration (PR) is the most important function for FME. It allows reconfiguration for given Port/Accelerated Function Unit (AFU). It creates platform devices for fpga-mgr, fpga-regions and fpga-bridges, and invokes fpga-region's interface (fpga_region_program_fpga)