On 03/29/2018 10:17 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:29:46PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Daniel!
I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
the below must be static.
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+enum drm_mode_status
On 03/29/2018 10:17 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:29:46PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Daniel!
I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
the below must be static.
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+enum drm_mode_status
Hi Oleksandr,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180328]
[cannot apply to v4.16-rc7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Oleksandr,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180328]
[cannot apply to v4.16-rc7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:29:46PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Hi, Daniel!
>
> I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
> the below must be static.
>
> On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +enum drm_mode_status display_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:29:46PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Hi, Daniel!
>
> I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
> the below must be static.
>
> On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +enum drm_mode_status display_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +
Hi, Daniel!
I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
the below must be static.
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+enum drm_mode_status display_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+{
+ struct
Hi, Daniel!
I just noticed I have missed one change in the patch:
the below must be static.
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+enum drm_mode_status display_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+{
+ struct
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
kms side looks good now too.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
Thank you
On 03/28/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
kms side looks good now too.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
Thank you
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:47:41AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Add support for Xen para-virtualized frontend display driver.
> Accompanying backend [1] is implemented as a user-space application
> and its helper
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:47:41AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Add support for Xen para-virtualized frontend display driver.
> Accompanying backend [1] is implemented as a user-space application
> and its helper library [2], capable of running as a
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Add support for Xen para-virtualized frontend display driver.
Accompanying backend [1] is implemented as a user-space application
and its helper library [2], capable of running as a Weston client
or DRM master.
Configuration of both
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Add support for Xen para-virtualized frontend display driver.
Accompanying backend [1] is implemented as a user-space application
and its helper library [2], capable of running as a Weston client
or DRM master.
Configuration of both backend and frontend is done via
14 matches
Mail list logo