On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:01:22AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:49:08 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > > Is this any different from the generic one introduced in patch 1/4? I
> > > would rather just use the generic definition.
> >
> > Well,
Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:49:08 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Is this any different from the generic one introduced in patch 1/4? I
> > would rather just use the generic definition.
>
> Well, according to Will Deacon (and as documented in the commit log)
> we can optimize
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:35:30PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Implement arch-specific atomic_io_modify and atomic_io_modify_relaxed,
> > which are based on writel/readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed,
> > respective
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:35:30PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Implement arch-specific atomic_io_modify and atomic_io_modify_relaxed,
> which are based on writel/readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed,
> respectively.
> In both cases, by relaxing the readl, perfomance can be improved.
>
Implement arch-specific atomic_io_modify and atomic_io_modify_relaxed,
which are based on writel/readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed,
respectively.
In both cases, by relaxing the readl, perfomance can be improved.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia
---
arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 4
5 matches
Mail list logo