On Fri 2021-02-05 14:50:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:35 PM Richard Fitzgerald
> wrote:
> > On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > >>
On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to extract
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:23 PM David Laight wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko
> > Sent: 05 February 2021 12:51
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:35 PM Richard Fitzgerald
> > wrote:
> > > On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >> On Wed,
From: Andy Shevchenko
> Sent: 05 February 2021 12:51
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:35 PM Richard Fitzgerald
> wrote:
> > On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:35 PM Richard Fitzgerald
wrote:
> On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
...
> >>> + for (; max_chars > 0; max_chars--) {
> >>
> >> Less
On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to
On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
> > ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to extract the
> > field out of the full
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
> ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to extract the
> field out of the full converted value. If the string contains a run of
> valid
The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to extract the
field out of the full converted value. If the string contains a run of
valid digits longer than will fit in a long or long long, this would
overflow and no
9 matches
Mail list logo
