Le 12/02/2018 à 00:34, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:04:42 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
On 02/11/2018 07:29 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:27 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue
Christophe Leroy writes:
> In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue on
> the 8xx by re-using the 'slices', this patch enhances the
> 'slices' implementation to support 32 bits CPUs.
>
> On PPC32, the address space is limited to 4Gbytes, hence only the low
> slices will be us
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:04:42 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> On 02/11/2018 07:29 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:27 +0100 (CET)
> > Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >> In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue on
> >> the 8xx by re-using the 'slice
On 02/11/2018 07:29 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:27 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue on
the 8xx by re-using the 'slices', this patch enhances the
'slices' implementation to support 32 bits CPUs.
On PPC
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:27 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue on
> the 8xx by re-using the 'slices', this patch enhances the
> 'slices' implementation to support 32 bits CPUs.
>
> On PPC32, the address space is limited to 4Gbyte
In preparation for the following patch which will fix an issue on
the 8xx by re-using the 'slices', this patch enhances the
'slices' implementation to support 32 bits CPUs.
On PPC32, the address space is limited to 4Gbytes, hence only the low
slices will be used.
This patch moves "slices" functio
6 matches
Mail list logo
