Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

2013-08-01 Thread Matt Sealey
IEEE1275 (Open Firmware) specification has details on it in the MMU (section 3.6.5), Memory (section 3.7.6) node specifications and the glossary defines how the property should look. How you find that document is.. up to you (I have a PDF of it I got hold of around 2004, it used to be linked at www

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

2013-08-01 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Montag, 29. Juli 2013, 23:39:45 schrieb Matt Sealey: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi Heiko, > > > > Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Heiko Stübner: > >> Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being > >> part of the periph

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

2013-07-29 Thread Matt Sealey
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Heiko Stübner: >> Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part >> of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram. >> >>

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

2013-07-29 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Heiko, Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Heiko Stübner: > Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part > of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram. > > Therefore add an option mmio-sram-reserved to keep arbitrary p

[PATCH v4 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

2013-07-29 Thread Heiko Stübner
Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram. Therefore add an option mmio-sram-reserved to keep arbitrary portions of the sram from being part of the pool. Suggested-by: Rob Herring Sign