Re: [PATCH v4 21/21] tpm: use u32 instead of int for PCR index

On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 16:58 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > The TPM specs defines PCR index a positive number, there is > no reason to use a signed number and it's also a possible security > issue as currently no functions check for a negative index, > which my into a large number when converted to u

[PATCH v4 21/21] tpm: use u32 instead of int for PCR index

The TPM specs defines PCR index a positive number, there is no reason to use a signed number and it's also a possible security issue as currently no functions check for a negative index, which my into a large number when converted to u32. Adjust the API to use u32 instead of int in all PCR related