Hi Adam,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20180516]
[cannot apply to linus/master block/for-next v4.17-rc5 v4.17-rc4 v4.17-rc3
v4.17-rc5]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 5/18/18 9:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks fine, although I'd split it into a aio and block_dev patch.
>
> Also please wire this up for the fs/iomap.c direct I/O code, it should
> be essentially the same sniplet as in the block_dev.c code.
>
Will do.
Looks fine, although I'd split it into a aio and block_dev patch.
Also please wire this up for the fs/iomap.c direct I/O code, it should
be essentially the same sniplet as in the block_dev.c code.
On 5/18/18 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/17/18 2:38 PM, adam.manzana...@wdc.com wrote:
>> From: Adam Manzanares
>>
>> This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call.
>>
>> When IOCB_FLAG_IOPRIO is set on the iocb aio_flags field, then we set the
>> newly added kiocb ki_ioprio f
On 5/17/18 2:38 PM, adam.manzana...@wdc.com wrote:
> From: Adam Manzanares
>
> This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call.
>
> When IOCB_FLAG_IOPRIO is set on the iocb aio_flags field, then we set the
> newly added kiocb ki_ioprio field to the value in the iocb aio_reqprio fiel
From: Adam Manzanares
This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call.
When IOCB_FLAG_IOPRIO is set on the iocb aio_flags field, then we set the
newly added kiocb ki_ioprio field to the value in the iocb aio_reqprio field.
When a bio is created for an aio request by the block dev w
6 matches
Mail list logo
