On 06/04/21 17:37, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 01/04/2021 21:30, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> While at it, replace group_smaller_{min, max}_cpu_capacity() with
>> comparisons of the source group's min/max capacity and the destination
>> CPU's capacity.
>
> IMHO, you haven't mentioned why you
On 01/04/2021 21:30, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
> out if they do not pass
>
> group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(, );
>
> which itself employs fits_capacity() to compare the sgc->max_capacity of
> both groups.
>
> Due to
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 21:30, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
> During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
> out if they do not pass
>
> group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(, );
>
> which itself employs fits_capacity() to compare the sgc->max_capacity of
> both groups.
>
>
During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
out if they do not pass
group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(, );
which itself employs fits_capacity() to compare the sgc->max_capacity of
both groups.
Due to the underlying margin, fits_capacity(X, 1024) will return false for
4 matches
Mail list logo
