* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> El Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:20:54AM +0200 Ingo Molnar ha dit:
>
> >
> > * Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >
> > > Ingo didn't like the duplication and suggested the use of a variable,
> > > which
> > > kinda implies a check for the compiler name.
> >
> > I don't thi
El Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:20:54AM +0200 Ingo Molnar ha dit:
>
> * Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> > Ingo didn't like the duplication and suggested the use of a variable, which
> > kinda implies a check for the compiler name.
>
> I don't think it implies that: why cannot cc_stack_align_opt probe
* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Ingo didn't like the duplication and suggested the use of a variable, which
> kinda implies a check for the compiler name.
I don't think it implies that: why cannot cc_stack_align_opt probe for the
compiler option and use whichever is available, without hard-codin
El Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:17:03PM -0700 h...@zytor.com ha dit:
> On June 19, 2017 11:37:57 AM PDT, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >For gcc stack alignment is configured with
> >-mpreferred-stack-boundary=N,
> >clang has the option -mstack-alignment=N for that purpose. Use the same
> >alignment as wi
On June 19, 2017 11:37:57 AM PDT, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>For gcc stack alignment is configured with
>-mpreferred-stack-boundary=N,
>clang has the option -mstack-alignment=N for that purpose. Use the same
>alignment as with gcc.
>
>If the alignment is not specified clang assumes an alignment of
For gcc stack alignment is configured with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=N,
clang has the option -mstack-alignment=N for that purpose. Use the same
alignment as with gcc.
If the alignment is not specified clang assumes an alignment of
16 bytes, as required by the standard ABI. However as mentioned in
6 matches
Mail list logo
