Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 03/07/2017 07:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: (Not sure I replied so here it is) On 01/27, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: From "./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt" - "The device tree graph bindings described herein

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 03/07/2017 07:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: (Not sure I replied so here it is) On 01/27, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: From "./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt" - "The device tree graph bindings described herein

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

(Not sure I replied so here it is) On 01/27, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > > On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > From "./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt" - > "The device tree graph bindings described herein abstract more complex > devices that

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

(Not sure I replied so here it is) On 01/27, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > > On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > From "./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt" - > "The device tree graph bindings described herein abstract more complex > devices that

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: Below is one binding that works for me. phy@34000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy"; reg = <0x034000 0x488>;

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/27/2017 05:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: Below is one binding that works for me. phy@34000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy"; reg = <0x034000 0x488>;

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > Below is one binding that works for me. > >phy@34000 { > compatible = "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy"; > reg = <0x034000 0x488>; > #clock-cells = <1>; >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/24, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > Below is one binding that works for me. > >phy@34000 { > compatible = "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy"; > reg = <0x034000 0x488>; > #clock-cells = <1>; >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 24 January 2017 07:35 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 24 January 2017 07:35 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/19,

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tuesday 24 January 2017 07:35 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tuesday 24 January 2017 07:35 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> >>> On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> >>> On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier >>> revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because >>> lanes

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Friday 20 January 2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier >>> revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because >>> lanes

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/20/2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because lanes are not devices and the whole "phy as

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/20/2017 03:12 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because lanes are not devices and the whole "phy as

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > >Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier > >revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because > >lanes are not devices and the whole "phy as a bus" concept not > >making

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/19, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > >Didn't we already move away from subnodes for lanes in an earlier > >revision of these patches? I seem to recall we did that because > >lanes are not devices and the whole "phy as a bus" concept not > >making

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: [..] + reset-names = "phy", "common",

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/19/2017 06:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: [..] + reset-names = "phy", "common",

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > [..] > > > > + reset-names = "phy", "common", "cfg", > > > > +

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On 01/18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > [..] > > > > + reset-names = "phy", "common", "cfg", > > > > +

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: > On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: [..] > > > + reset-names = "phy", "common", "cfg", > > > + "lane0", "lane1", "lane2"; > > Each lane

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

On Tue 17 Jan 22:54 PST 2017, Vivek Gautam wrote: > On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: [..] > > > + reset-names = "phy", "common", "cfg", > > > + "lane0", "lane1", "lane2"; > > Each lane

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi Kishon, On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. Adding dt binding information for the same.

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi Kishon, On 01/16/2017 02:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. Adding dt binding information for the same.

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides > support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. > Adding dt binding information for the same. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Hi, On Tuesday 10 January 2017 04:21 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides > support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. > Adding dt binding information for the same. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam > Acked-by: Rob Herring > --- > >

[PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. Adding dt binding information for the same. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam Acked-by: Rob Herring --- Changes since v3: - Added

[PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add support for QMP phy

Qualcomm chipsets have QMP phy controller that provides support to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB. Adding dt binding information for the same. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam Acked-by: Rob Herring --- Changes since v3: - Added #clock-cells = <1>, indicating that phy is a clock