On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:15:02AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-20, 11:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > It is because of per-CPU vs per domain drama here. Imagine a system with
> > 4 CPUs which the firmware puts in individual domains while they all are
> > in the same perf domain and hence OPP
Hi both,
thanks for looking into this.
On 12/9/20 5:45 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-20, 11:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> It is because of per-CPU vs per domain drama here. Imagine a system with
>> 4 CPUs which the firmware puts in individual domains while they all are
>> in the same perf
On 08-12-20, 11:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> It is because of per-CPU vs per domain drama here. Imagine a system with
> 4 CPUs which the firmware puts in individual domains while they all are
> in the same perf domain and hence OPP is marked shared in DT.
>
> Since this probe gets called for all the
Hi All, thanks for your feedback, please see below
On 12/8/20 12:22 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:34:36AM +, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/8/20 11:20 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 08-12-20, 07:22,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:34:36AM +, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/20 11:20 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> > > > On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > > On 02-12-20,
On 12/8/20 11:20 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:31:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-20, 10:58, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/8/20 7:26 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> > >> On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >>> On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> > On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> > >> nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> > >> if (nr_opp <= 0) {
>
On 08-12-20, 10:58, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/20 7:26 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> >> On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >>> On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
>
On 12/8/20 7:26 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
>> On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
if (nr_opp <= 0) {
- dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP
On 08-12-20, 07:22, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> >>nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> >>if (nr_opp <= 0) {
> >> - dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n");
> >> -
Hi Viresh,
thanks for looking into this. Please find below
On 12/8/20 5:50 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
>> By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of
>> performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware
>> dependencies
On 02-12-20, 17:23, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of
> performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware
> dependencies (although they may match in many cases).
>
> It is therefore possible to have some platforms where
By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of
performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware
dependencies (although they may match in many cases).
It is therefore possible to have some platforms where hardware may have
the ability to control CPU performance at
14 matches
Mail list logo
