On 05/04/16 10:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void
>> *par)
>
> Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the
> hypervisor/physical-cpu thing.
I don't
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> +int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool pin, int (*func)(void *), void
> *par)
Why .pin and not .phys? .pin does not (to me) reflect the
hypervisor/physical-cpu thing.
Also, as per smp_call_function_single() would it not be mor
On some hardware models (e.g. Dell Studio 1555 laptop) some hardware
related functions (e.g. SMIs) are to be executed on physical cpu 0
only. Instead of open coding such a functionality multiple times in
the kernel add a service function for this purpose. This will enable
the possibility to take sp
3 matches
Mail list logo