On 18/07/2013 12:58, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21:38PM +0200, boris brezillon wrote:
I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML
and LAKML).
But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to.
When you send me patch 5/5 with no
On 18/07/2013 13:25, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
Applied, thanks.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
> may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
Applied, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21:38PM +0200, boris brezillon wrote:
> I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML
> and LAKML).
> But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to.
When you send me patch 5/5 with no other information on the rest of the
On 18/07/2013 11:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
I'm missing patches 1-4?
I can send you the whole series
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
> may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
I'm missing patches 1-4?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
This patch fix a bug introduced by commit
6f0d94790efe9f4481bbd7c174ef0e9b5e5db7c4 where clk_disable_unprepare was
called with user_lock hold.
Signed-off-by: Boris
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
This patch fix a bug introduced by commit
6f0d94790efe9f4481bbd7c174ef0e9b5e5db7c4 where clk_disable_unprepare was
called with user_lock hold.
Signed-off-by: Boris
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
I'm missing patches 1-4?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 18/07/2013 11:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
I'm missing patches 1-4?
I can send you the whole series
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21:38PM +0200, boris brezillon wrote:
I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML
and LAKML).
But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to.
When you send me patch 5/5 with no other information on the rest of the
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
Applied, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 18/07/2013 13:25, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:48:40AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
clk_prepare/unprepare (and indirectly clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare)
may sleep and thus cannot be called in critical section.
Applied, thanks.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 18/07/2013 12:58, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21:38PM +0200, boris brezillon wrote:
I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML
and LAKML).
But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to.
When you send me patch 5/5 with no
14 matches
Mail list logo
