This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received
checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of
the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit
and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gaspara...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 88b31f2..3b3fdf6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -607,7 +607,17 @@ static int vxlan_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
 
        __skb_tunnel_rx(skb, vxlan->dev);
        skb_reset_network_header(skb);
-       skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
+
+       /* If the NIC driver gave us an encapsulated packet with
+        * CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY and Rx checksum feature is enabled,
+        * leave the CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, the device checksummed it
+        * for us. Otherwise force the upper layers to verify it.
+        */
+       if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY || !skb->encapsulation ||
+           !(vxlan->dev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM))
+               skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
+
+       skb->encapsulation = 0;
 
        err = IP_ECN_decapsulate(oip, skb);
        if (unlikely(err)) {
@@ -1175,7 +1185,9 @@ static void vxlan_setup(struct net_device *dev)
        dev->features   |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
        dev->features   |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;
        dev->features   |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
-       dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
+       dev->features   |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
+
+       dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
        dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE;
 
        spin_lock_init(&vxlan->hash_lock);
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to