On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:26:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
>> we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
>>
>> This is intended to be used my the
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:26:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
> we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
>
> This is intended to be used my the memory failure code in
> do_machine_check.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:26:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
This is intended to be used my the memory failure code in
do_machine_check.
Signed-off-by: Andy
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:26:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
This is intended to be used my the
In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
This is intended to be used my the memory failure code in
do_machine_check.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 2 ++
In some IST handlers, if the interrupt came from user mode,
we can safely enable preemption. Add helpers to do it safely.
This is intended to be used my the memory failure code in
do_machine_check.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net
---
arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 2 ++
6 matches
Mail list logo