Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Qing Xu
On 11/07/2012 10:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:09:53PM +0800, Qing Xu wrote: From: Qing Xu Signed-off-by: Qing Xu Applied, thanks. +max8925 regulator device register is still handled by mfd_add_devices, not by +of_xxx, so, it is not necessary to add compatible name.

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:09:53PM +0800, Qing Xu wrote: > From: Qing Xu > > Signed-off-by: Qing Xu Applied, thanks. > +max8925 regulator device register is still handled by mfd_add_devices, not by > +of_xxx, so, it is not necessary to add compatible name. Also, those reg > +offset and id

[PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Qing Xu
From: Qing Xu Signed-off-by: Qing Xu --- .../bindings/regulator/max8925-regulator.txt | 29 drivers/regulator/max8925-regulator.c | 72 +++- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644

[PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Qing Xu
From: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com --- .../bindings/regulator/max8925-regulator.txt | 29 drivers/regulator/max8925-regulator.c | 72 +++- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:09:53PM +0800, Qing Xu wrote: From: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Applied, thanks. +max8925 regulator device register is still handled by mfd_add_devices, not by +of_xxx, so, it is not necessary to add compatible name. Also,

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfd: max8925: support dt for regulator

2012-11-07 Thread Qing Xu
On 11/07/2012 10:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:09:53PM +0800, Qing Xu wrote: From: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Applied, thanks. +max8925 regulator device register is still handled by mfd_add_devices, not by +of_xxx, so, it is not